You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Either Paul knows he'll get this reaction, or he doesn't, and both possibilities are hilarious and what makes Twitter so fantastic: https://twitter.com/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fpaulg%2Fstatus%2F1129897694984646657&src=typd …
It is quite hard to predict, when you say something, what people will pretend you said instead. And in fact I think these explosions are somewhat nondeterministic. Some things that could be attacked never are. Others sit quietly for a while, then suddenly leap the fence.
By "leap the fence" I mean spread to a new audience, who are not interested in the topic of the tweet but in the tweet itself as an (apparent) instance of some heresy. But whether that happens depends on a lot of random factors you can't predict.
Asking sincerely here, but isn't it just possible that most people don't agree with the premise embedded in the tweet? Isn't it possible they think the AirBnB founders were actually men of some privilege and maybe not the best example "anyone can do it"? Could that be the case?
What's a Twitter user to do? If he throws something out there and nobody responds, Twitter dies over a not so long timeline.
That sounds like something a MONARCHIST would say, you daemon worshipper
Great Milo/Peterson podcast on just that this week https://www.stitcher.com/s?eid=60804151&refid=asa … Paul's power is growing too fast. Like Milo, his own people will take him down for something innocuous. Content doesn't matter. This is the archetypal story of Tower Babel, destroyed by semantics
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
