The two axioms that explain your experience with devices that contain software (except Teslas): I. It takes extraordinary effort to make software that's not horribly difficult to use. II. Companies whose main focus isn't software don't expend extraordinary effort on it.
-
-
Apple is another interesting case to consider-how did they identify internally?
-
Yes, it is. I think the answer is that they consider their products to be hardware/software hybrids.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Tesla is as much a software company as Apple is. The devices are just bigger.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I thought it was a car rental company...no?
End of conversation
-
-
-
Not disagreeing, I just have a different take on this. Hardware is much more modular than software. The old wisdom is that HW is more expensive to make than SW. This old wisdom is false and companies plan wrong. Tesla is a vertical company. It makes SW and HW (actual silicon).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Arguably Tesla applies a century of driving UX.
-
A car with reins would be pretty cool.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And now, their NNA makes them even more of a leader in software and chip industry in the future. I need to rewatch their latest live where they deep dived into the chip they designed from scratch. Loved it!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes exactly The output of this just happens to drive
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.