Experts are seldomly correct, in fields where data distribution is not bounded. Just look at the (almost) whole field of economics.
-
-
-
Technical analysis is, for exemple, a field full of experts who get fooled by randomness and see patterns where there is none.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Experts are wrong many times. Sometimes conspiracy theorists are right.
-
This goes without saying I think
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sometimes it takes hindsight to know that some experts were conspiracy theorists all long and some conspiracy theorist, experts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Experts are correct? Have you lived under a rock for the last few decades. Experts lie and skew data to satisfy their overlords.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think this is also why people who are experts in certain areas can be dismissed as conspiracy theorists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would argue that experts aren't correct, but that they realize when they are not and correct themselves, while conspiracy theorists will just find another lie to explain their initial error or lie.
-
"...science makes progress funeral by funeral: the old are never converted by the new doctrines, they simply are replaced by a new generation." - Paul Samuelson
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree in general, though I would say that experts are often correct. How often they beat randomness depends on what they're an expert in, ranging from astronomers down to political pundits.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.