It's not uncommon in the startup world for a new idea to be dismissed by know-it-alls simultaneously with growing rapidly among early adopters. I'm not sure why, but these ideas seem to do even better than the ones that aren't dismissed by know-it-alls.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
They're usually right, though. You remember the ones that are successful; the vast majority are stupid, & obvs so, & fail. & the irrantional feeding-frenzy often drives stupid ideas to the appearance of success, meanwhile depressing the value of actually-good ideas.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's actually a good heuristic to be gleaned here from running this process in reverse: Any supposedly qualified expert with a bad record of dunking on presumptuous-but-proven-to-work ideas is probably more valued by the system for their gatekeeping role than their ideas.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As a mentor I always quote the Pope. "Who am I to judge?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Couldn't you then create a successful VC fund by rounding up those persons and investing in everything they ridicule?
-
No, see
@ganeumann’s neat reply there. Haters gonna hate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
