Universities are backing themselves into a dangerous corner by becoming more expensive at the same time they're becoming less necessary.
-
-
Not many billionaires in the seventies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a big mistake people (including most reporters and even some economists) make about trends in stratification. If the top .1% had x% of wealth at t1 and x+n% at t2, that doesn't imply the rich got richer except to the extent the top .1% are the same people at both times.
-
While a good point, I think that those are just small parts of the rich population: some degree of them join and some leave, but I suspect the bulk of the fortunes remained and grew.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
>nor Gates's nor Buffet's Just simple folk, US Senators and founders of billion dollar lawfirms. Riff-raff basically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But they were all quite rich. Inequality and classism isn’t just reserved for the 0.1%.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe include someone who didn’t go to an Ivy when arguing they don’t matter. (Fully willing to concede that the education provided doesn’t matter.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is silly you cherry pick 4 billionaires when studies have been done and data shows that the best way to get rich and stay rich is to be born into a wealthy family.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.