It doesn’t matter how good your ideas are if you can’t communicate them.
-
-
It’s probably better stated that “Your ideas benefit greatly from you being able to communicate them well.” Communication isn’t a prerequisite, but it sure is a useful corequisite.
-
The really interesting idea in this neighborhood is that there's a cycle: attempting to explain something to other people often causes you to improve it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Crypto is a great example. Solved a really significant technical challenge but in general, has been pretty poorly communicated.
-
Excuse me, what challenge exactly? I worked in blockchain (if you're not talking about cryptography) and I'd say that it solves contrived problems most of the time. It is also overly communicated, though often in vain.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree with your statement, but not with your examples. If you proved or solved and insoluble technical problem, it’s not an idea anymore. It’s reality. So not a good example.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
e.g. Bitcoin, page ranking, Hinton's backpropagation algorithm in 1986
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Leibniz actually requested that his paper introducing binary numbers not be published because most people thought the idea was totally useless.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting, do you think Bitcoin would have become what it is today had Satoshi’s white paper not been a masterpiece?
-
Maybe the more nuanced way to capture both points is that creators don’t get to capitalize (i.e. financially) on things they can’t communicate effectively - but someone else will eventually.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.