Hypothesis: Cities should be designed to prioritize (individual) travel in inverse proportion to speed. E.g. give walking priority over cycling and cycling priority over driving. Maybe even give sitting priority over walking.
Show this thread
I'm less sure of this one, but it may also be a good idea to optimize for extremes of age. I.e. a city that's good for children and old people will be a pleasant place to be.
-
-
paul you ever been to orlando
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
For example, lots of public squares accessible only to pedestrians. The children play in them and the old people sit and watch everything that's happening.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Accessible design ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It sounds like a good optimization for very specific settings. My guess - most people want the most efficient method of transport. Likely a combination of speed, convenience, and experience.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mr. Graham, I wanted to invite you to hear "The Most Valuable Podcast of Our Time" and spread the Good News if you agree. http://Sovrumano.com/philosophy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The measure of a society is how it treats its weakest members
-
That too, but what I'm claiming is that such cities will be not merely be ethical, but also pleasant for everyone, including the strong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Audio only if it's convenient for you: https://www.buzzsprout.com/226199
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
small parks, cafes and plazas?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.