Now that's funny!
∀x(P(x) → Q(x)) Twitter: Yawn. That is so obvious. P(a) → Q(a) Twitter: Outrage!
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Inductive reasoning vs empirical evidence. No prizes for guessing which one Twitter prefers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"The fool generalizes the particular; the nerd particularizes the general; some do both; and the wise does does neither"
@nntaleb →Twitter hates nerds!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The 1st is the generic statement, the other is the specific case?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
what if XP(x) generates only a singleton set ? , maybe that's the context the lady had :-)
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Okay, as a non-mathematician, does this mean a universal truth is boring to Twitter, but details that it would confirm as both being true would ignite Twitter, which doesn't have the capacity to let them coexist and a polarized fight about which is true and which not would ensue?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.