Try this thought experiment: If new technology suddenly made it cheap to fix climate change, would Ocasio-Cortez stop wanting to raise taxes? I would guess not. I think the desire to raise taxes precedes the choice of how to spend the money.
-
-
The idea of GND is that our economics of austerity are based on pie fallacy and a big national mobilization is the way to grow the pie dramatically. It's a rejection of our country being a managed like a family budget. Also, though separate, poverty and inequality are linked.
-
Perhaps the fundamental disagreement here is: Is poverty and economic inequality linked? Imo: As the pie grows economic inequality means the growth is not dispersed proportionately due to systemic barriers. Thus you need to disrupt those barriers to solve poverty.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wouldn’t the lump of labour fallacy instead argue for the complete automation of all fixed labor, rather than an investment in dynamic new labor markets aimed at rebuilding the entire nation’s infrastructure?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nobody is saying the goal is to *eliminate* inequality. Strawman. *Extreme* inequality is a hugr problem. My guess is most people reading this thread would be shocked at the median life experience in the US, and see the problem as much bigger than just poverty.
-
*huge* Also, the related problems exacerbated by inequality: undermining any hope of meritocracy, capture of democracy toward narrow interests, reduction of future innovation (why try if you can't win), etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.