Try this thought experiment: If new technology suddenly made it cheap to fix climate change, would Ocasio-Cortez stop wanting to raise taxes? I would guess not. I think the desire to raise taxes precedes the choice of how to spend the money.
-
-
That's why I believe neither solution is adequate on its own. GND is the project to tackle poverty. Higher taxes is the way to tackle inequality. I believe we can do both. The screenshotted section in an earlier draft actually said 'eliminate poverty'.pic.twitter.com/qD5bmLmdva
-
Longtime PG fan here too, but I find his original tweet disingenuous because he’s implying
@AOC ONLY wants to raise taxes (on income above $10M, part which he left out) to ONLY address climate change. And that’s obviously not the only reason and there’s no way he didn’t know that
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think the argument is that you can't attack poverty without attacking inequality. It's not adjacent, it's dependent. And this isn't really a claim about economics, it's a claim about democracy and how it gets captured by wealth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t think you can examine poverty in isolation of inequality, they’re structurally connected, especially over longer time scales.
-
I think the Millennium Development Goals are an example of how an exclusive focus on poverty can be a problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lmao you don’t see how poverty and inequality are inherently linked?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.