You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
On Twitter you can use retweet-with-comment as a test of this. You don't engage earnestly with someone by quote-tweeting them. Retweet-with-comment is a way to tell _other_ people (who already agree with you) "look what this idiot said."
I'm not saying retweet-with-comment per se is bad. There are good things you can do with it. It's just a bad way to engage with someone you disagree with.
you are not engaging with that person - you are engaging with your followers by using that person as a prop. Can be good too, but it's usually bad for any conversation
It's funny, because you're probably right. retweet-with-comment CAN be used to say why you agree w something (& make it yours, vs a blind retweet). but then a comment can also be in agreement, but yet people assume that getting "ratio'd" is bad.
Well, if that someone has no intention of engagement, an unproductive attempt to engage is no better than the "bad way" to engage via RT-with-comment. Engagement is a two-way sided relationship.
Talking over vs Talking with
I use it to avoid getting buried in a megathread. Twitter really needs more dimensions than just "down".
It’s also part of a “cable news shows” culture that people adopt in engaging others. For the most part, there’s no really listening or engagement toward understanding or breaking down issues, just debate for the sake of it and attempts at one-liners.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
