@paulg which is better to pitch to investors:
A) A product with decent traction in the music-tech space that many investors are afraid of or B) A product that doesn’t even exist “yet” with ZERO traction but huge HUGE first mover possibilities?
The former, if you can explain why it's not vulnerable to whatever makes them dislike such startups. (And if it is vulnerable, why do it yourself?)
-
-
From what I’ve been told it’s usually the critical mass that’s required to have a great exit (musically) or the total amount subs to make it a big business (Spotify). It’s not that they DONT invest in them, it’s just that it’s not a buzzword like AR/Crypto
-
If you have good growth, you don't need buzzwords.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.