The worst thing to seem to investors is borderline promising. If a startup is obviously promising, you'll raise money easily. If it's obviously unpromising, you'll get an immediate no. But if it's borderline promising, the no will come after sucking up months of your attention.
-
-
You can't figure out whether you're better than borderline promising from investors' reactions. If you're borderline promising, investors will still want to continue the conversation, and will seem encouraging. You have to use your own judgment, or ask an unbiased third party.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sometimes the sector one creates is new and the VCs are going for the obvious ones. Stick to customer reactions, adaptation takes time. 6 month money doesn’t decide a fate for any start-up. It’s like creating Analytics platform in 2010 in India and guessing why VC not funding:)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, that's familiar. We were in the same situation last summer, it was hard but fortunately we solved it! If you interested, I also wrote about this story:https://medium.com/@dev.gaborhorvath/how-we-built-one-of-the-google-plays-best-apps-of-2018-the-vimage-6510af84eef6 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.