(I have some misgivings about this format, because it means the text isn't really online anywhere, just some pixels that represent text. But I'm tired of threads.)
Show this thread
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really using Twitter for their MVP service: microblogging. Do you think better investors operate with an increased lag time (they had a corner, it’s hopeless) or decreased lag time (they had a corner, said they turned it, and I know this team is solid)?
-
In other words: do better early investors cast a super wide net or a narrow net where they help build a few things? One is quick to move on, the other doubles down on their bets to build. I’ve seen both models, but in an asset class with a small number of outsized returns, idk.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So withholding information is a Nash solution? If you’re doing poorly then you’re discounted less. If you’re doing well then people clamor for insight and access.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is much better than threads
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is what investors believe about the Googles true or a misconception?
-
True-ish. It's sort of a cartoon version of the truth.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
two independent questions: 1. how do you define product-market fit? i think that's what you're alluding to 2. what about startups with hard technology?
-
Look at
@mwseibel’s definition it’s the most concise without losing any information density I’ve seen. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.