For a long time I thought ppl were saying dumb things about rationality, until I realized they were using a different definition of rationality from me. I think their definition is something like "If social consensus is that an idea is unpromising, then that idea is irrational"https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1090608908534800384 …
-
-
Yeah, I would just bundle the financial, hedonic, and other potential benefits/losses together under the umbrella term "utility," and talk about whether the decision is rational overall, with respect to utility
-
I think the definition of 'rational' as 'financially optimal' comes from classical economics — or maybe an oversimplification of classical economics — bleeding over. It's not a bad definition, but it's not widely useful outside of economics, imho
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What's going on here is that when some people (people at the leading edge of some change) like something, it's not as random as they think. Wozniak seems to like something the same way a model train enthusiast does, but in *his* case his liking has predictive value.
-
Yup. Same thing for scientists who "irrationally" refuse to give up on a theory when it seems to be contradicted by experimental results. Sometimes, a good scientist's intuitions - e.g., about the predictive value of "beauty" or "elegance" in a theory - turn out to be correct
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.