> but there will never be enough money to solve the big important problems like universal healthcare or education. Assumes its own conclusion: that aggregated issues ('healthcare', 'education') must be solved by 'giving' (taxation). Healthcare was monopolized as was education.
Interesting thread from someone who really knows what he's talking about.https://twitter.com/ChaseAdam17/status/1090694946955247616 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Video on taxes v philanthropy:https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/1090045108064579584?s=21 …
4:34Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great thread... curious what your takeaways are from this? I was particularly alarmed by a recent tweet of yours equating a platform to raise taxes to help solve the big problems Chase talks about here (healthcare, education, income equity etc) a "class war."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On avg, is govt or philanthropy an actor for systemic change? Poverty, income inequality, health care, unemployment, are systemic issues philanthro capitalism can’t systemically change but government policy can. The problem is participating in democracy at scale to inform policy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hans Rosling would be proud of that thread.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.