It's only "class warfare" when the rich are the target. Since the 1980's the wealth divide has increased, the rich got richer, working people and the poor have been losing, but that's not "class warfare."https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1089194158961684480 …
-
-
From some democratic candidates, not all. We should not only focus on those
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And you don't hear this in discussions about cutting "entitlements," eliminating student loan bankruptcy, etc.? Come on, man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When Warren Buffett says that he pays a lower tax rate than his secretary, would you equate a desire to change that to an intention of harming him?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"harming" by increasing taxes on the ultra-wealthy? How is that harm by any rational definition? Taxes increase the public good: build schools, roads, pay for policemen/firefighters, etc.
-
It disincentivizes investment and risk-taking.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You're using "harm" in a very relative and questionable way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There’s been 40 years of class warfare against the working class.
-
Well said
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Majority vs minority mob mentality
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's meaningless to define class warfare based on supposed intentions. If one group works to benefit themselves, at another groups detriment - there is conflict, whether the intentions were primarily focused on own benefits or others detriments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.