I didn't realize this before Twitter, but it's a good sign when the response to something you write is angry and incoherent. It means you wrote something novel enough to make people mad, and correct enough that you didn't leave room for actual refutation.
-
-
A strange thought indeed! Thank you for providing such a perfect example of the kind of tweet I was referring to.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe if there were no anonymous accounts allowed. It's rare for accounts to be both non-anonymous and full of inconvenient truths. If you build your brand around it, it requires a lot of self knowledge not to eventually compromise by signalling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This duty has nothing to do with Twitter. Nor with being rich, for that matter. Being rich has a way of making it convenient to deal with inconvenience.
-
Yeah, to think this is a phenomenon unique to Twitter is pretty naive
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please keep doing so
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I dont think the set of rich people is quite it. Some rich people are quite vulnerable to twitter mobs (celebrities like aziz ansari), and some with modest, but far more secure, livelihoods (
@Timcast) are relatively immune to them. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.