When you think the only purpose of reading is to absorb information as efficiently as possiblehttps://twitter.com/paulg/status/1086589381820014592 …
No, when I think the only value in your article is the information it contains. Which you have to admit is the case with a lot of articles.
-
-
That's not what you said, though. Magazine articles (by which I assume you mean features, since they're usually the ones with non-traditional leads) often have an aesthetic storytelling quality, which adds depth and nuance. Ignoring them misses half the impact.
-
If the writer is really good, I want their storytelling. If not, I'd rather spend the time reading a second article.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just in time information is as much a revolution as just in time inventory.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My only value in reading is to absorb information efficiently. Why is he treating that like a bad thing?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.