I have a good monitor and yet when I print things out and read them on paper, I always discover flaws I'd overlooked on the screen. This happens with both writing and code. Is paper better, or merely different?
Show this thread
-
Well, It indeed was superior to the peasants but inferior to the nobles who were literate and powerful. Money, power, asymmetric knowledge all have been interesting interoperable currency and remain to be. Some books (religion) helped control groups. Some books made groups rebel.
What I meant by that is that in the earlier middle ages, literacy was a near monopoly of the clergy (clerk = cleric), who were forbidden to marry.
-
-
I believe clergy across many civilizations acted as King’s private knowledge internet and were prevented from having own family and focus on pursuit of wisdom. If their asymmetric knowledge was monopolized by King, knowledge did result in superior mating success for the Royals:)
-
is it necessary to win everytime, how do you decide when to back off! and isn't flexibility the biggest moat that the Startup's have.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think it’s more on the development level rather than evolution level. People of your generation studied on paper during the prime time of your brain development. We need to see if your preference of paper is still popular among the next generation who grow up with screen mostly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You put too much faith in an eccleiastical bed police. The reason everyone was talking about sin a lot in the middle ages was because people were doing a LOT of sin in the middle ages. Including the clergy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.