If nine year olds played football at school the way they do math, it would consist entirely of drills zigzagging through cones, without even touching a ball, supervised by coaches who had never played in or perhaps even seen a match.
-
I found your tweet to be unproductive and unkind. There is great work being done with young [math] learners/learning. There could be more; I hope for more. I left pointers to a couple of people working in/around elementary [math] education. Have a look:https://twitter.com/benjamindickman/status/1074464694012919814 …
I'm sure you mean well, but I can't help noticing that even though we now have two more adjectives, neither of them is "inaccurate." And an accurate analogy can often be productive, because it suggests ways to improve. E.g. make school math closer to math as it's actually used.
-
-
If you contend your initial tweet will be productive because it "suggests ways to improve" or that your "E.g. make school math closer to math as its [sic] actually used" is novel or even well-defined... or that "not inaccurate" means should be tweeted... then we disagree, deeply.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.