A pattern of I've noticed in the careers of the ambitious: work long hours when you're getting started (when you both can and must), and 4 hours a day when you're established (when you can't and needn't).
-
-
6 hours is a healthy balance I think
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A good example is Clint Eastwood. Not sure how many hours he puts in every day but at 88 he is still making good movies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe there's a huge drop off in peak mental performance after 4 highly productive hours. So there's no reason to work more. Everything else is a waste of time (meetings, etc) if you consider that the alternative is spending time on important things like family & books.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are your habits.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not necessarily.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Warren Buffett is a good example of someone who continued to work long hours after he was established. Another example is Euler. Both were ambitious, certainly; but ambition is not the only driver of work obsession. For some people, the work itself is its own reward.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Working out OK for me. I wouldn't say "super healthily", but above par for a programmer at 48, and still putting in the hours.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't this contradicting with your article about the biggest regrets of dying? (http://paulgraham.com/todo.html )
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.