Imagine the reaction on Twitter if Darwin published the Origin of Species today. It was bad enough for him at the time, but imagine what it would be like now. If he had an employer, there's a significant chance he'd be fired.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He was independently wealthy.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Extreme negative feedback too early halts development.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
People do conduct research, and write books (even controversial ones) in the age of twitter. Unless the process *of writing* the book (and its intermediate states) are 'exposed' on twitter, Darwin should be fine
- Show replies
-
-
-
I think the best use of twitter might be to discuss various 'interests' with people who share those interests, but not really use it for validation of your 'core work' and ideas thereof. So you can chat about lisps, but if you plan to write a radical new lisp, don't tweet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Agreed! Also it’s much easier to share your idea anonymously. Look at Bitcoin. It’s an idea that is criticized by many but it also has its supporters.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I'm not sure: many people are actually more motivated by rubbing the people the wrong way. These people get driven by outrage. May be Darwin was such a person. May be someone else would be.
-
Darwin was not a disagreeable, ornery sort. He was more the retiring intellectual. Thomas Huxley was the zealous public supporter of the idea of evolution.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.