We think of social media as a way to exchange ideas, but although it's undoubtedly a way to exchange conventional ideas with people who already agree with them, I worry it might actually suppress some of the biggest ideas.
-
-
Show this thread
-
And by suppress, I don't mean just that Darwin would not have been actively tweeting about evolution. I mean he might have actually been less likely to follow up his initial ideas about it.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
think of HN comments, and smile )
-
The HN comments would be broken in a different way: they'd be clever-sounding arguments for why he was mistaken, or dismissals of his research as unimportant.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or imagine research on IQ or personality & gender differences published today...
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
10 Reasons Why Charles Darwin is Problematic...
-
Oh god.
this is so real
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think those publications led to today. We'd not have all these without having had those to shape mindsets
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.