What about the “dirty hands paradox”? - promoting near term repression of innocent ppl because of some longer term justification
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you have an example? In most cases, it's completely impossible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
speed limits
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are two more indicators you need to include, the tolerance level for such innocents swept up, and second the grey area of semi-innocent people. These are variable tolerances, with no specific quantitative values. E.g., answer in the US is quite different than say in China.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let me tell you a bit about taxes...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The true test is economics. What is the cost of letting guilty one keep operating? You might have to sacrifice 1M innocent people to take down Hitler but it might save 6M other folks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On theory yes all policy is logical one and with best interest of people. In praxis every policy is repressive if apply mentioned test.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The trick are policies which increase the number of guilty people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And the cost for each. If the cost is mildly burdensome for each innocent, but incredibly impactful for each guilty party, that should be weighed too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.