I bet I've heard 100 startups explain why they failed to raise money, and I don't think I've heard one say that the reason was that their company seemed unpromising. And yet that is almost always the reason in the investors' minds.
-
-
Users will take prob 30s to decide if they want to use the product and give no feedback. So that 30mins of investor feedback is invaluable.
-
Or it could be the worst advice you’ve ever taken. Why listen to someone that has no interest in seeing you succeed?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Paul, I think confirmation bias plays a big role here. People naturally avoid disconfirming evidence. Founders who solicit our objections can mitigate the bias and for the same reason have a better shot at finding PMF in my opinion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where is this assumption coming from? Are you seeing the same pitch from founders you’ve given feedback to? How are you tracking founder’s pitch revisions?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it's all about psychology. Just like on stock markets, some traders or investors easily caught up with the hype or they're just there to scalp some profits. They really don't care what field are you on but they just want results, results, results. The big fat ROR
-
Seek out better investors ASAP.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.