"Direction of maximum interestingness" is very good. But I wonder if "direction of maximum leverage" isn't even better, as a "True North."
-
-
Replying to @paulbaumgart
Any simple "direction of" algorithm is still at risk of climbing a lame hill, though. Gotta balance the exploration and the exploitation.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart Yeah, greedy algorithms -> local optima. "Direction of maximum leverage plus some randomness" sounds good though.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @traviskorte
@traviskorte With slowly decreasing randomness as you get older, perhaps.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@traviskorte Though on average I think ppl could allow themselves a lot more randomness if they shifted priority from consumption to freedom
2:46 PM - 29 Nov 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.