@atduskgreg @paulbaumgart You can check a logical proof for yourself in many cases and use it, no appeal to authority or context needed
-
-
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@paulbaumgart I think the question is a lot more interesting with the physical sciences.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @atduskgreg
@atduskgreg@paulbaumgart yes, as you get closer to human affairs, things get more culturally relative.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@paulbaumgart Yes exactly. It gets harder and harder not to invisibly embed values in supposedly “pure” truths.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @atduskgreg
@atduskgreg@paulbaumgart It takes courage to draw a line in the sand and decide for yourself where politics begins to dominate3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
@atduskgreg@paulbaumgart I see ideologues of all sorts as lacking courage to decide that larger-than-human truths exist and begin somewhere1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@paulbaumgart Really? In America at least I see far more ideologues claiming they have unique hold on larger-than-human truth.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atduskgreg
@atduskgreg@paulbaumgart ah that's just religion :) I mean more important things like deciding 2+2=4 is not about racism or LGBT rights1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @atduskgreg
@atduskgreg@paulbaumgart I trust myself to decide where the science ends, politics begins there :) My point is it's not ALL politics3 replies 1 retweet 1 like
@vgr @atduskgreg Interesting how we can *only* really trust ourselves in that undertaking.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.