Question you never hear asked while someone is being outrage-mobbed for a sacredness violation: "ok but how do they treat people?"
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing I have a sense our society used to be more virtue-oriented, and thus more self-regulatory. Fewer ethical arguments from law1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @harmonylion1
@harmonylion1@sarahdoingthing Which turned out to be too inflexible. Transitions are messy :/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@sarahdoingthing Virtue-focus is more flexible than legality-focus, isn't it? Problem is virtue can be hard to interpret1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @harmonylion1
@harmonylion1@sarahdoingthing Yeah, and that interpretation can't be trusted, because people are flawed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@sarahdoingthing So it will be a perpetual effort no matter what; seeking a perfect system to streamline humanity is fruitless1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @harmonylion1
@harmonylion1@sarahdoingthing Agreed that it's asymptotic. But that doesn't mean it's not worth improving :)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@sarahdoingthing What is the goal? My point is no correct combination of ideas can rescue us from the necessity of having guts1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @harmonylion1
@harmonylion1@sarahdoingthing The goal is to refine societal incentives to maximize human flourishing.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@harmonylion1 @sarahdoingthing And it has to be a grassroots, iterative, democratic process. Otherwise this goal is impossible.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.