@paulbaumgart one hand, it's "out there" & is 100% gut-feel Bayesianism. Wouldn't assert it. OTOH, it'd explain "everything" we see, simply.
@fnxTX It's a fun thought experiment, but it's a little too hard to falsify for my liking. :)
-
-
@paulbaumgart Yeah, Bayesian constructs like this aren't made for falsifying, they're for refining. Really nothing is ever falsified, but -
@paulbaumgart radical refinement might be what our "scientists" would call falsification through their application of Popper's method - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.