@paulbaumgart I'm somewhat afraid maybe you haven't even read the Satoshi Bitcoin whitepaper… d/t the decentralization lol earlier
-
-
Replying to @CTZN5
@paulbaumgart either way, maaaybe read that again. But then, a great second stop would be the Metadisk and Storj whitepapers.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CTZN5
@paulbaumgart Also you can't go wrong by reading, like, all of@VitalikButerin's stuff; you're sure to understand stuff even better after1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @CTZN5
@paulbaumgart Then ping me if it didn't Eureka into you after you're comfortable with all that shit, and I'll try to generate a moment.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CTZN5
@paulbaumgart Idk who REALLY gets it; I see a few ppl suggesting it; idk if they intuit the full stack. I think @/balajis has for a while.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @CTZN5
@paulbaumgart (I'll re-mention@balajis in this thread fork—he deserves the warm fuzzy of recognition, and we're all still human… afaik)1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @CTZN5
@fnxTX Ok so https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/03/28/schellingcoin-a-minimal-trust-universal-data-feed/ … helps me imagine things better. But there are still many contracts that seem unenforceable to me.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@fnxTX For example, how could a smart contract ever serve as a prenup with an infidelity clause?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@fnxTX And if there's ANY oracle that's still "a jury of your peers," then you need the whole rest of the legal/political system, too.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@fnxTX Reducing the types of facts that need to be determined by juries is a very valuable thing. But I'm unconvinced it'll ever go to 0.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@fnxTX Anyway, I should keep reading. Will do so over the next few days.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.