.@paulbaumgart You're question is precisely backwards. :)
Blockchains run on probability. Point a gun at probability, and know law from Law.
-
-
Replying to @CTZN5
.
@paulbaumgart As you rightly note, what many call "law" is mere suggestion at gunpoint. But Law cannot be coerced, or enforced by coercion.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart You exert force with force. Blockchains are for provable truth consensus. Used the right way, then, perfect law is a cakewalk.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CTZN5
@paulbaumgart Obviously, no, hashes will not gain physical form and bludgeon scofflaws and speed demons, but... c'mon, think a bit further.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @CTZN5
@fnxTX My objection is basically this: https://xkcd.com/538/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart lol. Well, the SHA256 of the PNG file in that strip is — 1dfd9f6409fccd5316779b99b835fefd20bd0b57b8bcecc8156c5798af00e9eb1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CTZN5
@paulbaumgart Let me know who you plan to smack to change that fact.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart And you don't see what can be done with that sort of thing, distributed and chained with thousands of other truth statements?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.