@balajis I moderated that panel. This is what was written in response: http://48hillsonline.org/2015/02/08/new-pro-growth-group-takes-politics-housing/ …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@balajis So the counterargument is that demand is ~infinite? Wouldn't prices quickly be approaching infinity then, too?6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@balajis that nuance gets totally lost in simple sloganeering1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@balajis Seems the core disagreement is long-term (market equilibrium) vs. short-term (preventing evictions). Why not do both?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart city does not tear down existing housing bc the new units are invariably much more expensive w/ construction costs1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Thanks for the details! Good to hear things are moving in a sane direction :)
12:05 PM - 11 Feb 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.