@balajis I moderated that panel. This is what was written in response: http://48hillsonline.org/2015/02/08/new-pro-growth-group-takes-politics-housing/ …
-
-
@paulbaumgart@balajis that nuance gets totally lost in simple sloganeering -
@kimmaicutler@balajis Seems the core disagreement is long-term (market equilibrium) vs. short-term (preventing evictions). Why not do both? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@paulbaumgart@balajis As I've written before, the supply-demand doesn't work argument they use gets simplified or watered down.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulbaumgart@balajis It's more an argument about whether new construction will enable housing prices to be affordable to families at AMIThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulbaumgart@balajis which is $75K a year in SF.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulbaumgart@balajis in reality, I'm not aware of a developed country that doesn't use a combination of subsidies, public housing,Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulbaumgart@balajis tax credits, in addition, to market dynamics to make housing work.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.