@abenomixx Analogies don't have to be perfect to be worthwhile, just offer food for thought :-)
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@abenomixx But maybe my taking this to a meta-discussion wasn't very useful. I agree there's some major oversimplifications.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @abelisted
@abenomixx Ok :-) So on epistemic bubbles: the concept seems pretty ad-hominemy to me. Usually comes up when attempting "systems thinking."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@abenomixx Is it anything more than a more clever-sounding way of accusing someone of arrogance?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @abelisted
@abenomixx "Predetermine" is pretty strong. Belief systems certainly form the basis for creating *hypotheses.* But it's only a problem if...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@abenomixx ...falsifications don't feed back into the belief system.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@abenomixx Fair. But not all epistemic bubbles are created equally. That is, some are more predictive than others.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.