. @interfluidity it crosses zero boundary from -ve to +ve rights, so something new there. Would love a post on -ve --> +ve threshold.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@interfluidity Isn't the zero point a bit arbitrary? Like other coordinate systems, more a matter of definition than inherent property.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@interfluidity Maybe. Maybe right way to understand threshold is positive *unconstrained* right (unlike other entitlements)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@interfluidity I see it as sort of a refactoring of the market. Greater decoupling of survival from trade -> greater market efficiency.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@vgr@interfluidity I guess I just don't see the discontinuity you're suggesting, is all.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@interfluidity constrained entitlements like food stamps require less "free energy" type money than BMI. Can be fenced in.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@vgr @interfluidity I suppose loss aversion does imply a qualitative difference between negative and positive rights.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.