@ramez in your singularity article, should it be "able to design a new AI that is only 70% *more* intelligent *than* itself?" 1, 2, 3.4...
-
-
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart That's fantastic, Paul! Would you be okay if I added that to the post, with attribution to you?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart I won't get to it until tomorrow at the earliest. No hurry.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ramez
@ramez Fixed graph: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1584015/ai-progress-graph.png … with explanation of how numbers are calculated. Raw numbers: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1584015/ai-progress.xlsx …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@ramez BTW, my math earlier was off. The twice-as-intelligent being can create an intelligence sqrt(2) times (about 40%) smarter than itself1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@ramez Also, there are probably other plausable functions beyond polynomial and exponential. But I can't spend more time on this for now :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.