Fromherz explores the distinct, cosmopolitan ethos & practices that emerged from “Middle Period” Gulf ports, which were not so closely tied to the circumstances of agricultural or political centers. Being flexible, adaptive, tolerant was necessary for survival.
-
-
Show this thread
-
These port locations were considered "dangerous" in that they didn't fit the typical paradigms. They had remarkable independence politically with a heavy emphasis on cosmopolitan trade.
Show this thread -
Fromherz points out that only recently have we thought of the locations around the Gulf as singular and distinctive in their identities. It was very much fluid, however, and free of imperial control.pic.twitter.com/OIHEfXCXnF
Show this thread -
As a matter of convenience & necessity, we see intellectual ideas emerge in poetry or travel writing about “universal human experience” outside of religious or political worldviews, even as the Gulf is a critical place for the development of medieval Islamic culture.
Show this thread -
-
So much is left unsaid about the Gulf region in narratives of this time that are the most popular (Ibn Buttuta, Marco Polo), who we tend to rely on for our world history classes.
Show this thread -
Theirs were impressions biased against the Gulf, narratives in which they thought there was widespread decline. They have problematic, contradictory lenses through which to see the Gulf that dominate our views.
Show this thread -
BUT we actually see lively maritime sites with independent rulers, trading communities, cosmopolitan locations outside of central powers. Fromherz shows us a mosque that may have once been a Hindu temple as an example of the significant overlap.
Show this thread -
Fromherz posits that these were places where a form of “medieval humanism” could be cultivated. From the perspective of the Gulf, the “Middle Period” isn’t one of decline or depression, but of prosperousness and collaboration.
Show this thread -
One question that emerges here is how we define the geographic (or intellectual) limits of what we consider “global.” Setting spatial boundaries is certainly as tenuous as our arbitrary temporal markers for “medieval.”
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Be a patron!
