Paul Scharre

@paul_scharre

Senior Fellow & Director of the Technology and National Security Program at CNAS. Author of "Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War."

Vrijeme pridruživanja: studeni 2013.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @paul_scharre

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @paul_scharre

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    24. tra 2018.
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    “As China attempts to impart its authoritarian values on the United States,” said in her recent testimony before the Senate, “private industry and the U.S. government must develop a set of solutions to push back.”

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    This is an incredible conceptual piece. I'm really taken with the simplicity and the inherent message about adversarial AI attacks.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    📢 Looking fwd to next week, if you are going let me know! If you aren't going but want to connect me with someone who is, send them my way! FYI

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    “...technology controlled by China’s Communist Party, thus opening itself up to further blackmail and sabotage.” 3/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    London’s “decision to make high-risk provider Huawei part of its 5G networks is that of a nation that has given up on technological sovereignty. Driven by pro-Beijing business interests and post-Brexit fears, the U.K. is making its most critical infrastructure dependent on...” 2/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Devastating & compelling. What’s the point of Brexit if Britain is ceding it’s “technological sovereignty” to China? 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    “Emerging technologies are revolutionizing the influence game,” writes in her report on how the U.S. government and tech companies can combat disinformation. Read her recommendations here:

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    How can the U.S. rise to the China challenge? The new report from offers nearly 100 recommendations on boosting U.S. competitiveness in the Indo-Pacific and beyond:

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    . joins ’s Why It Matters podcast to discuss military automation: “People are still in charge of weapons today, but the technology is going to make it possible to hand over control to machines.” Listen here:

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    New working paper! Why and how are armed drones spreading? New data and analysis from , , & myself - check it out!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I am a Republican and very proud of POTUS accomplishments, but these assertions are very rational and not without merit. It is deeply disturbing, we need a coherent policy in regards to AI now, cannot defer for later🇺🇸

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij
    Poništi
  14. 31. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 31. sij

    Tough stuff. But it's no secret that the Administration's efforts so far have been big on press releases but short on $$ and details.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 31. sij

    "the administration’s new principles for AI represent little more than gauzy generalities when America’s competitiveness and security demand a comprehensive, forward-looking, and well-resourced approach consistent with our values."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 31. sij

    "the administration’s immigration policy is at war with America’s AI needs."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 31. sij

    "Although the administration has told agencies to prioritize AI research and development, it has failed to set spending targets, establish metrics, or allocate additional funding."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 31. sij

    "it is hard to take seriously the administration’s commitment to U.S. competitiveness in AI when it has proposed sharp cuts to federal investment in science and research."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 31. sij

    "The U.S. cannot lead the world in AI if we do not engage it. Worse, our isolation risks allowing China to set AI standards and norms across the globe for a generation."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 31. sij

    "The White House principles are the latest example of this insufficient approach. ... the principles are so vague as to justify potentially unlimited legal challenges from industry groups while giving the White House an effective veto over any proposed agency regulation."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·