Nehru didn't have a command economy, for one, two, it is an empirical fact that the soviet union did industrialize, as did most of the eastern european countries.
-
-
Renaissance seems to begin as the rebound of a collapse (black death, etc.), but some cultures have had nice, long bounces before a second collapse. The surplus of a Renaissance can be converted directly into political squabbling, or into something less adverse.
-
That’s rather downstream, then. Hamilton’s musings were on a millenial timescale, concerned with what kind of cultural or genetic blends were more likely to play a new game in a Malthusian recess, rather than merely live quantitatively better, or squander it entirely.
-
Do you have a reference off-hand? That description seems to place his conjecture outside the field of agency.
-
It’s a paragraph in “Innate Social Aptitudes of Man”, freely avl online. He observed rebirths ~800 yrs after invasions; theory that civ selects against innovators, so replenishment long-term beneficial. Practically? Don’t waste asabiyah; reward & replicate creators?
-
So there's no benefit in trying to design a system that accommodates innovators, by his conclusion? I wonder if there isn't a way to give them space within a culture, though.
-
No he wasn’t fatalistic, was def in favor of promoting desirable traits -he recognized that we couldn’t expect it to happen on its own.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.