While pitting “inclusion” in opposition to free speech may or may not make sense, using “pluralism”- a word which has always been about plural opinions as well as identities- as a stand-in for *stopping* people from voicing divergent ideas is really depressing doublespeakhttps://twitter.com/nytimes/status/973262065233219585 …
Replying to @toad_spotted
Oof. There’s a logic there, tho: many ways of knowing, each ultimately communitarian & thus *sacred*. So, I defend freedom of speech for both science and traditional tribal lore - up until the point some scientician publicly says Indians have *not* always been in America.
12:29 PM - 18 Mar 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.