However he wants to phrase it, that’s substantively the case
Are consenting adult property owners not allowed to make agreements to regulate access to their joint territory?
-
-
They are allowed: that is the libertarian argument. National borders that aren't universally agreed upon shouldn't override individual property owners' preferences.
-
He says this in the blogpost as well.
-
Right, so crossing borders isn’t negative freedom
-
You can advocate benefits of open borders but restriction is legitimate prerogative of citizens
-
We can pick this up again later but i’ve been struck by the silence induced by the club goods argument, which should only be a problem for libertarians if they’ve reified the state, a category error
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.