I just RTed the three dna tests I took, you can see how different they are for yourself one of them said I was fucking italian and the other two dont, insito doesnt even have its iberian data set even up!
-
-
-
Replying to @paul_hundred
ya but in the sense they were specific abt certain things, natgeo was more weird because it was more wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @turrible_tao
Ok - so those Finn, Ashki, and Basque results seem genealogically plausible?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paul_hundred
I trust insito is high quality those are specific enough they are probably not random, finn might just be amerindian tho, idk enough abt my ancesty to say my grandfathers last name started as Barruq or some me shit and he was orphan,grandma has a lot of irish and we dont know why
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @turrible_tao
Right, those are sufficiently distinct that the model would have to be very flawed to erroneously produce them. But when i see stuff like this i worry (unless this is just corporate dirty war):https://www.reddit.com/r/23andme/comments/7xuwe2/23andme_and_insitome_results_are_very_different/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paul_hundred
insito does not have iberian genome even up yet at all and it confuses ppl, this is especially bad for hispanics, I cant fully judge them until they actually put up iberian but I asked them and they said they arent ready yet so they avoid it
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @turrible_tao @paul_hundred
they are the newest so 23andme is probably still better insito probably needs another few years
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah i’m assuming Ancestry and 23 have had more time and samples to iron out kinks, all else (choice of granularity) being equal
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.