You're arguing for the 46-63 view, which I share, but you haven't quite got the math and biology right.
-
-
(But seriously from Pearl Harbor on is actually when there can be said to be a natalist trend)
-
What? All the men were away?
-
There was a boom, a relative dip, and then the full on postwar boom, but iirc it was clearly a departure from the preceding era birthrate. Needs double-checking tho
-
-
It was a different era. Litters were larger in those days.
-
I don’t know about sheer births, am just pointing out that there was a change in fertility trend.
-
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
- End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.