Paul Henne

@paul_henne

Assistant Professor . Experimental Philosophy and Cognitive Science.

Chicago, IL
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2019.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @paul_henne

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @paul_henne

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    11. svi 2019.

    "A Counterfactual Explanation for the Action Effect in Causal Judgment" is out now at Cognition:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. velj

    New on psyarxiv, “The role of causal structure in implicit cognition” by . We show the IAT registers stronger effects for *causal* relations that mere associations. (Call it the ICT? IC&AT? IC>AT? … )

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. velj

    Exciting new paper in experimental philosophy of causation. If C causes E, must it be that C either directly causes E or causes an intermediary that in turn causes E? The surprise answer is: no

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    New Post: Post-Doc Opportunity

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. velj

    Men are consistently underrepresented in fields such as health care & education...”Why doesn't anyone care about this gender imbalance?” Great question & great article by ⁦

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    More opportunities to join - new roles available for User Researcher, Product Designer, Data Scientist & Academic Lead. Apply through our portal and help us build the most trusted research platform on the internet!

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    What are the most interesting recent books or papers on in philosophy or nearby disciplines?

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    New paper from philosopher Hanna Pickard argues that experimental philosophy research on causation and counterfactuals can help us understand what goes so wrong in people's ordinary judgments about rape

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Pleased to share a new paper finding that making utilitarian vs. deontological decisions produces different kinds of regret-- utilitarian judgment leads to feeling bad without thinking another choice would have been better. [happy to share pdf on request]

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    12. pro 2019.

    Our new blog post (w. 's David Rohde) explains our workshop paper. We show that representing causality within a std Bayesian approach interpolates between tractable and impossible queries opening up new approaches to causal inference.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Interested in understanding the phenomenology of our past moral transgressions? I have a paper for you! The latest from our , spearheaded by the great !

    Poništi
  12. 25. sij

    A great discussion of teleological essentialism on the x-phi blog:

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    How has philosophy grown on Twitter, on YouTube, and in podcasts over the past ten yearss?

    Poništi
  14. 24. sij

    I've been using Prolific in my recent work. Check it out! Here is $100 for your first study on Prolific! via

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    My lab has a fully funded Master's student position available. We're on the Gulf Coast, and we do research on memory and serial behavior. More info. below (deadline Feb. 15). DM me with any questions! . (Re-tweets appreciated)

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    Moral AI? We reviewed 49 papers proposing moral algorithms and classified them according to ethical system type (consequentialism/deontological/virtue ethics/particularism) & technical implementation strategies.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Ethicists, Moralists, Psychologists, and Trolleyologists! I am pleased to announce our latest paper: "Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants" just out in (thread)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij

    CFA for the 1st European Experimental Philosophy Conference! (with keynote by Jesse Prinz as well as invited speakers , , and Michael Laakasuo)

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij

    Trump has repeated the false claim that the border wall is being built...86 times. Is there any method behind this madness? We found that repeated Trump statements are perceived as more true relative to non-repeated statements. Preprint here:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij

    Check out our new preprint in which we find that Trump's tendency to repeat claims (whether true or false) increases the perceived truth of those claims, even for democrats!

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·