Also, I reject the notion that communist flags and Nazi flags are comparably evil symbols. Yes, communism seems inevitably to go Very Badly, but its ideals at least *sound* noble. There is. no. noble. ideal. behind Nazism or the Klan: they're evil all the way down.
-
-
Replying to @steuard
Sorry, but this is a false and content-free template fill: "I reject the notion that [evil symbol ingroup uses] and [evil symbol outgroup uses] are comparably evil. Yes, each was used by mass murderers, but [our mass murderers] had noble ideals which [their mass murders] didn't"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrissimo
Patri. You are talking about Nazis. *Nazis*. Please tell me the "noble ideals" associated with the Nazi cause that you consider it acceptable for someone today to admire. I recognize that your "template" is a nasty and pernicious pattern. But you are defending *Nazis*.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steuard
Sorry, but when did I defend Nazis? I am looking back at the text of our exchange and not seeing anything that defends Nazis. I merely pointed out that "association with murderous hateful groups" is something done by both left and right (hence why both horrify me).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrissimo
Everything you're saying is in defense of the position that Nazis are no worse than any other extreme-ish political faction. That a man waving a torch and shouting "Jew shall not replace us!" is somehow equivalent to a painfully naive teenager wearing a Che shirt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steuard @patrissimo
That naive teenager can at least claim that she's an admirer of Guevara's utopian prose and ideals even though she deplores his actions. She may be a fool, but she's motivated by good. There is nothing redeeming, nothing admirable in Nazism: it is evil in BOTH action and motive.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steuard
There are redeeming and admirable things about nationalism & ethnonationalism. Those things don't mean "hating and killing", they mean organizing in like groups to form societies. And most alt right are ethnonationalists, not Nazi-lovers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrissimo
Yeah, I'm not going to be okay with ethnonationalism as "redeeming and admirable". I don't see any way to separate ethnonationalism from ethnic cleansing (which I've seen alt-Right people advocate, in various less and more violent forms). It's a *bad* way to form a society.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steuard
I see America as the first large, successful non-ethnostate. So ethnonationalism is the foundation of every country in history & the most proven way to build a stable society. I like US better, but it still seems insane to call ethnonat irredeemably evil w/ nothing admirable!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrissimo
[Random historical aside, coming from a place of considerable ignorance: Didn't Rome aspire to be a non-ethnostate too, to at least some degree? They deliberately mixed ethnic groups throughout the empire, and as I recall they even had some emperors from the outlying regions.]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Rome was much more favorable to conquered nations than past empires, but that was relative, it was still the case that only ethnic Romans could be citizens (and citizenship was a huge deal, ie it included voting/running for office): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_citizenship …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.