The anti-Flynn effect is well established for reaction time and WM performance (high g-loaded), whereas the Flynn effect is well supported for STM measures (low g-loaded). This is a good review: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300988 …
Paper: "Were the Victorians cleverer than us?" - Me: wait, there is evidence of an opposite-of-Flynn effect?!? *Head splode*. Someone more objective than me please tell me if this is plausible. I like the idea too much to evaluate accurately. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000470 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Read papers that cite that one, I think it is likely not true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.