1/ I doubt I'm the first to say this, but: #HODL is a cartel, one which (approriately) is simultaneously pedestrian and innovative in the same ways as #cryptocurrency itself.
-
Show this thread
-
2/ It's pedestrian because it's just a group of producers (hodlers) restricting supply to maintain price (Econ 101 - https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/economics/monopolistic-competition-and-oligopoly/cartel-theory-of-oligopoly …).
1 reply 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
3/ A cartel works even better for a store of value than a good or commodity because there is no "use value" being compared to the price. The nominal (fiat) price almost doesn't matter, so demand is highly inelastic, hence price is highly sensitive to supply.
1 reply 1 retweet 22 likesShow this thread -
4/ But it's innovative because the cartel is massive and decentralized (much like the technology itself). Large cartels have been considered difficult to impossible due to coordination problems and the incentive to defect. But
#BTC has, so far, proven that wrong.3 replies 3 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @patrissimo
a decentralized pyramid scheme. is it better than a centralized pyramid scheme or is it worse?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tobaccocologne
Well, kinda but also not. There is real value being built, unlike in a pure pyramid scheme. If the cartel can hold price long enough for Bitcoin to be a useful product (which will happen), they can cash out to end users.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrissimo
it was a useful product and now its not. because of hodlers. value of a medium of exchange depends on people adopting it because they value it as a medium of exchage not hoarding it for merely exploiting.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tobaccocologne @patrissimo
I believe theres a level of exploitation which is productive and above or below that point is plain harmful for both the users and the medium of exchange. if the MOE does not become a safe harbor but something else then it attracts not users but speculators of bad sort.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tobaccocologne @patrissimo
what if in the end states own large chunks of bitcoin? no regulation is not that good when opponents can have major influence and turn your currency to junk like gold. will it be a useful product in the end? idk.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
States owning bitcoin doesn't give them much influence. States mining bitcoin raises the possibility of a 51% attack (Tor was attacked successfully once, I believe0.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.