"Progress is not made by crushing some swarm of malevolent foes, but by finding balance between competing truths" https://nyti.ms/2uXsFJB
-
-
Replying to @patrissimo
I love this in general. But if one of the "competing truths" is "kill, expel, or subjugate all non-whites," I'm not okay with "balance".
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @steuard @patrissimo
If I see a crowd waving swastika flags and chanting "Jew will not replace us," I'm not sure "swarm of malevolent foes" is far off the mark.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steuard
Would you describe convicted, escaped murderers that way, who actually killed, didn't just say scary words? Or would you have compassion...
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrissimo
Why are you framing this as either/or? I have compassion for circumstances that drive someone to murder, but they could still be dangerous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steuard @patrissimo
I consider "malevolent" to refer to the *threat* posed by a person or a group more than to their past actions. Marching Nazis = real threat.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
"malevolent" invokes "evil" to me, and privileges condemnation over practical threat analysis. It's not a label that promotes understanding
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.