Women: -Alpha Seed (high desire for man --> screws him to get his "seed") -Beta Need (he's good enough to marry to meet her needs) Men: -Beta Seed (she's good enough to screw & give his "seed" to) -Alpha Need (high desire for woman --> he'll "need" a relationship w/ her).
Your model is fundamentally feminist and anti-male, because it describes relationships where the man is making ongoing investments, but the woman isn't. That's broken. A real man wants to get ongoing investment (ie female Beta) in exchange for what he gives.
-
-
I'm not following you here. Please elaborate.
-
You said "Women desire TWO things from men..Alpha-Male genes, AND his provisioning." but "men only desired ONE..her Alpha-Female genes." This is equivalent to saying "men & women can each offer genes, but only men can offer ongoing investment (provisioning)"
-
Historically, in a brutal, untamed world prior to men building civilizations, women were far more necessitous of security and provisioning from men. Men have never relied on women for their security and provisioning -- for their survival. Men's CHILDREN relied on that from women
-
I think 4 billion years of evolution just might have endowed men with a little bit of an instinct to value the survival of their offspring. Unless you don't believe in evolutionary biology.
-
I'm not disagreeing with you. I clearly stated that in my tweet above. "Men's CHILDREN relied on that from women", "that" being a woman's nurturing of his children.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.